{"id":595,"date":"2012-02-29T19:35:00","date_gmt":"2012-03-01T02:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/?p=595"},"modified":"2012-02-29T19:37:59","modified_gmt":"2012-03-01T02:37:59","slug":"failure-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/?p=595","title":{"rendered":"Failure Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I work in Marketing. This is how we categorize facts in Marketing:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Stuff I made up.<\/li>\n<li>Stuff someone else made up.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I can explain this to you in greater detail if you like. It sounds like a very ignorant view of the world but it is much more cynical than it is ignorant. Even those &#8220;crunchy&#8221; facts from engineers get heavily interpreted before anyone does anything with them, so in the end it comes to the same thing anyway.<\/p>\n<p>I went to a trade show a couple of weeks ago. My boss and I were told, or asked, or gently nudged (I don&#8217;t really know which) to summarize the trade show. Time for facts. You haven&#8217;t forgot the definition yet, have you?<\/p>\n<p>I made some stuff up. That is, I gave my opinion on what I saw. I didn&#8217;t use numbers to prove any of it. I really did just write my opinion of what I saw. I was not equipped to do anything else. I haven&#8217;t been to trade shows before, and even though I asked I wasn&#8217;t given any guidelines on the right things to do or tasks to be completed. So I had nothing orderly and countified to factify.<\/p>\n<p>My opinions seemed limited to me; in particular to have very little to say about how my company did at the trade show. This is because I spent little time at our booth and would have very little sense of what success meant for us. I haven&#8217;t been to a trade show before. So I sent my summary of the trade show to lots of other people so that they could tell the rest of the story.<\/p>\n<p>In return I got a meeting with my boss and the manager of another department, where we were told that everything I wrote would ruin the company and cause us all to die of anthrax poisoning. I was advised to rewrite everything so that it reflected the goals and message we were working to project into the market.<\/p>\n<p>This made very little sense to me so I doggedly didn&#8217;t agree to do it. I tried not to be too blunt about this because I know that it would be bad to sound completely opposed to feedback, but in thinking about it to myself I couldn&#8217;t even get to the end of the reasons why this would be a bad idea. Obviously telling yourself you were a wonderful success when you were not would be a bad idea; but the biggest issue was more fundamental than that: I have no idea whether we did well or not! It would be absurd for me to write a summary talking about our success when I am completely innocent of any such notions.<\/p>\n<p>But I was stridently advised that I would have no friends left in the whole company if my invidious criticism of everything were published. Now I completely confess that I set out to talk about things we have not accomplished; for me the whole exercise was attempting to peer over the horizon at what comes next. Forecasting is basically what my job comes down to as a Marketing Analyst. But I did not consider that in fantasizing about tomorrow I was condemning yesterday. I didn&#8217;t think of it as criticism.<\/p>\n<p>There are many threads involved here and I am not attempting to cover all of them. The point I wish to draw out here is that, notwithstanding I clearly feel the risks were exaggerated, before the meeting I was not even aware that there were risks. I certainly intend to rewrite the report more carefully in order to mitigate those risks as best as I now perceive them.<\/p>\n<p>I am frequently amazed when testing turns out to have been quite necessary to ensure quality. I generally subsist on a presumption that I did things right, once I&#8217;ve done them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I work in Marketing. This is how we categorize facts in Marketing: Stuff I made up. Stuff someone else made up. I can explain this to you in greater detail if you like. It sounds like a very ignorant view of the world but it is much more cynical than it is ignorant. Even those &#8220;crunchy&#8221; facts from engineers get <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/?p=595\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=595"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":597,"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595\/revisions\/597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cleverdialectic.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}